TacticSupportedIn the free check

Avoid keyword stuffing / SEO-filler

Traditional keyword stuffing does not improve, and can reduce, visibility in generative engine answers.

Best study is at least large-n observational or controlled, with some replication. Outcome data is still mostly correlational.

Supported as advice: a lab test found stuffing did not help, and Google's spam policies prohibit it. The free check's density threshold is our heuristic — no engine publishes one.

How we grade →

How to fix

Write naturally: repeating a keyword doesn't help, and Google treats heavy repetition as spam. The free check flags a page when one word is more than 8% of its content words (pages of 150+ words), our own rule of thumb.

  1. Find the flagged word in the row details.
  2. Read the page aloud and rewrite sentences where it sounds forced.
  3. Swap in pronouns or plain alternatives ("it", "your team") where the word adds nothing.
  4. Cut keyword lists, repeated city or service lists, and footers stuffed with search terms.
  5. Keep your buyers' words where they matter: the title, a heading and the answer.

How to check it worked: run the free check again. The "Reads naturally" row should pass: "No word is repeated unnaturally."

What the free check looks for

  • Read the page aloud; rewrite anything that repeats a phrase unnaturally.
  • The free check warns when one non-stopword, non-brand word is over 8% of a 150+ word page — a loose heuristic, not a standard.

Caveats

  • — Correlational studies dominate this field. AI citations churn: a small 15-prompt preprint (arXiv 2609.22655; the author sells AI-visibility tooling) saw each engine's cited URL set change by about 67% on average from one day to the next, with under 1% URL overlap across engines. Toronto (2610.15033) found only about 40% of the within-site pattern of ChatGPT citations still held two weeks later, and 14% after ten weeks. Re-verify yearly.
  • — Included in the free page check.

Studies and docs

2024

GEO-bench lab test (GPT-3.5 engine reading five fixed Google results): keyword stuffing did not beat the unedited baseline and did worse on Perplexity. The ~40% lift is for citations, quotations and statistics on position-adjusted word count, not a ChatGPT citation rate.

2026

Defines keyword stuffing as filling a page with keywords or numbers to manipulate rankings, e.g. repeating words or phrases so often it sounds unnatural. No numeric threshold.

← All tactics · How we grade

See what AI agents can find on your site

Our free AI visibility check shows whether AI agents can reach, read and quote your site, with each fix graded by evidence. There's no overall score, and no one can promise citations.

Free. No password.